Kangana’s Reply To Hrithik Roshan!

The legal tangle of Kangana Ranaut and Hrithik Roshan takes a new path after Kangana’s lawyer reacts to Hrithik’s statement. Kangana’s lawyer Rizwan Siddiquee says that Hrithik’s statements seem to earn sympathy and nothing more. He also says that Kangana is not in a situation to gain publicity, by using Hrithik’s name. He states, "Mr Hrithik's statements made to the media are nothing but efforts to gain public sympathy. He cannot wash his hands off the matter now after having threatened criminally, my client and having intimidated her, without any provocation. He also cannot deny the fact that my client never named him anywhere, and it was he who claimed to be the 'Silly Ex' in his notice. Besides his acts of stating in the media that he would rather 'date a Pope' gave enough fodder to the media to start speculating. How can he blame my client for all his acts of commissions and omissions? Further, he should have refrained from making false statements in his notice. He specifically claimed that he does not know my client socially at all. If that were the truth, then how was he attending my client's private birthday party with his entire family and my client was attending his party besides his sister's and his father's birthday party as well. There is enough proof on a public platform, which sufficiently proves that Mr Hrithik Roshan is lying. Pursuant to my counter notice there are now new claims that my client was not co-operating with the police to help with investigation of Mr Hrithik's complaint. These claims are as false as his other claims. The fact is that my client was never dealing with any impostor and given the background of the matter, it is very lame on Mr Hrithik's part to even suggest that. Besides, my client was never ever asked for any co-operation in the said matter by any person for obvious reasons. The fact that Mr Hrithik waited for seven months to lodge a complaint says it all. Now pursuant to receipt of my notice, the complaint is once again being looked into by Mr Hrithik Roshan only as a face-saving strategy. It is also worthy to note that Mr Hrithik Roshan specifically claims to have received 50 unsolicited emails per day from my client for about 601 days (as calculated from 24th May 2014 up to 16th February 2016). Accordingly, he should have received more than 30,000 emails from my client as against his own alleged claim of receiving only 1,439 emails from my client during the said period. This shows that there is non-application of mind even while making allegations. At least make efforts to do the calculations. Besides, if he was really receiving unsolicited emails from my client then why he didn’t prudently block my client and went on receiving her emails for such a long time. The answer is obvious. His own actions speak a lot and I need not say more on behalf of my client Ms Kangana Ranaut. Most importantly, I would like to point out that at least Mr Hrithik Roshan should have bothered to ensure that he has a good reason to send a legal notice to my client. However as expected the notice is absolutely baseless, unsubstantiated, unwarranted and uncalled for. There is not even a case of defamation made out against my client and he is issuing a notice for defamation without application of mind. He needs to immediately realize that my client Ms Kangana Ranaut does not need Mr Hrithik Roshan's name to garner publicity or attention, as she is a renowned public figure herself. I sincerely hope that the matter ends here and better sense prevails." What will be Hrithik’s reply? Let us wait and see!