Sathyam Mathrame Bodhippikku Movie Review

Sathyam Mathrame Bodhippikku is scripted and directed by Sagar. Dhanesh Raveendranath Dhanesh Raveendranath is an India-based Cinematogr >> Read More... cranked the camera, and Ajeesh Anand edited the film. William Francis Bio coming soon... >> Read More... composed the music. Smruthi Cinemass produced the film. Dhyan Sreenivasan Dhyan Sreenivasan is the younger son of Malayalam >> Read More... , “ Sudheesh Sudheesh is a popular face for the Malayalam film >> Read More... ,” Rony David Raj Rony David Raj is a professional Indian film actor >> Read More... , Sreejith Ravi Sreejith Ravi is a famous Malayalam movie actor an >> Read More... , Ambika, and Johny Antony Born to C. J. Antony and Liduwa Antony in Changana >> Read More... are cast in the main roles.

Plot

James is an IPS officer. He gets a new case for investigation. As this is a high-profile case involving a lawyer, he is interested in solving it soon. After getting involved deeply in the case, he finds out that he is trapped in this case. Soon, he decides to get out of this trouble, which would spoil his career. Was he successful? The rest of the film deals with this.

Star Performance

Dhyan played the role of James and did justice to it. However, he should’ve avoided the slow-motion scenes and actions that are supposed to be styles. Sudeesh’s performance is excellent. Rony played an interesting role. The rest of the characters have done what was required.

Analysis

The script is simple, and we have seen the fake encounters in a lot of films. When we wait for the second half for the interesting twist, we are disappointed with the old twist. Though the actors performed really well, some of the characters, which had loose writing, didn’t impress us. After a few scenes, we know what is waiting for us in the climax. But, the makers explain those scenes sincerely again, which we have already understood a few scenes back. It looks like Sudeesh’s talent is wasted. Though he delivered an outstanding performance, his character elevation was not done properly, which made his performance go in vain. The second half has some engagement quotient. Those slow-motion styles should have been avoided. The villain character is not developed well enough to overperform the hero.

What’s There?

• The performances are decent
• The second half has a few interesting elements

What’s Not There?

• The styles are not actually styles
• Some characters should have been developed well

Verdict

If some characters had been developed well, and certain things had been avoided, the film would’ve been better!